THANK YOU TO ALL4 HAPPY,HEALTHY,HEALING HOLIDAYS
24NOV09 Sharons 62cv09-1163 Appeal A09-2031
AFFIDAVITS OF SHARON L. ANDERSON AKA CHERGOSKY-PETERSON-SCARRELLA AND WILLIAM PAUL DAHN, Protected Class
DECEDANTS: JIM CASCI,JIM ANDERSON,TENANTS IN COMMON
BILL AND BERNICE PETERSON,HEIRS,ASSIGNS,ET AL.BARBACLU of MN Lantry St. Paul Inspection WINN ET AL.
To Shari Moore City Clerk Email et as interests appear
310 City Hall 15 Kellogg Blvd., West
Saint Paul, MN 55102
310 City Hall 15 Kellogg Blvd., West
Saint Paul, MN 55102
In the Matter of Aaron Foster Sr. v. City St.Paul et al
rcvd by City 13Nov09 without Filing Fee or Court ID
rcvd by City 13Nov09 without Filing Fee or Court ID
| 2. | Summons and Complaint in the matter of Aaron W. Foster Sr. vs. the City of Saint Paul. |
ISSUES:
A. AFFIANTS,DECEDANTS,CITIZENERY OF ST.PAUL, reserve the Right and Privilege to Intervene, Amicus Curie in what ever court or Administrative Hearing Aaron Foster Appear's.
B. THEREFORE: The legislative Branch City Council, must suspend item no. (2) Grant Public Hearing, Witness's, Testimony and DSI Employees such as Aaron Foster's X Wife Lisa Martin, and reopen over 3 thousand propertys re: 2008 Tax Delinquent Ramsey Dist. Crt. 62cv09-1163, that had towed Cars,Furniture, at the St.Paul Police Impound Lot.
C. Reopen the http://www.justiceforbarbara.com/ case
Case law Brief:
Affiant Sharon, by information and belief and as told to Sharon the Following
Sharon verily believes Jim Casci was " Murdered" to keep from testify before Judge Edward Cleary in the Foster and Sholoman Case's,
I donated thousands for dollars to the to St Paul Harley Davidson and Tom Gianetti along with Bill Finney for the annual diabetes foundation. The funds were given to Aaron Foster to give to this cause but 90% were never derived, this I can prove. I have requested records from Tom Gianetti, St Paul Harley Davidson, Diabetes Foundation, and the U of M, but have received nothing. All contribution made thru Mr. Aaron Foster. Oh, and I am barred from St Paul Harley Davidson. "Guilty"
The St Paul Police Department tried to intimidate me with 32 moving violations, and I beat them all. It all started when I said I was going to
Note to Joe: update your MN Eminent Domain for Public Policy
Randy Furst Thanks for Strike Force Info: Re: Bud Shaver and http://www.alicekrengel.blogspot.com/ MNSupPrecedant. Kory Land http://www.levander.com/
25 yrs later still fighting the Corrupt System When you have time read the NOTE TO JUDGE JOHN VANDENORTH:
Re: Apparantly the undersign humbly request that you get a Mental and Physical Exam as Your Memory Loss is either Covert or Complicit.
FURTHER: Full disclosure by ALL Judges in their lack of Computer knowledge is pervase/fatal and puts the MN Judiciary at risk for Ignorance.
IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE THEREFORE IGNORANCE
OF HIGH TECH COMPUTER SCIENCE, FORENSIC FILES TO PLEAD
BY PHONE,E-COMMNERCE,SKYPE(SP) IS ALSO NO EXCUSE TO DENY
DUE PROCESS, BLOW THE WHISTLE ON CITY,COUNTY CORRUPTION.
www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson Transcript of Judge John Vandenorth, MEMORY LOSS MANDATES FULL DISCLOSURE OF THESE JUDGES WHO ARE INCOMPETANT IN THE HIGH TECH OF THE WWW www.taxthemax.blogspot.com pg. 17 "Can't remember" Judge John Vandenorth ie: Bill Dahn
Hey the recent law suit of Aaron Foster v. City St.Paul apparent former Manager of St.Paul Police Impound Lot re: Sharons91 Chrysler with disabled plates, Trailer etc. must reopen not only the 3 thousand alleged Property Tax 2008 Delinquency's based on Alleged Summary "Abatements" Nuisance laws without Criminal Charges must be incompassed into A09-2031
Taxes 1982 SharonAnderson,BernicePeterson et al Sharon4Anderson ScribdFrom: cwalsh@ij.org
To: sharon4anderson@aol.com
Sent: 11/24/2009 10:25:59 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: New York High Court Upholds Eminent Domain for Private GainINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE
901 N. GLEBE ROAD SUITE 900 ARLINGTON, VA 22203 (703) 682-9320 FAX (703) 682-9321
HOME PAGE: WWW.IJ.ORG
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:November 24, 2009
New York High Court Upholds
Eminent Domain for Private Gain
Arlington, Va.—The New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, today announced that it would uphold the decision of the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) to condemn privately owned homes and small businesses to make way for wealthy developer Bruce Ratner’s so-called “Atlantic Yards” development of 16 mammoth skyscrapers centered around a basketball arena.
“Today’s decision puts homes and businesses throughout New York at risk of condemnation,” said Dana Berliner, a senior attorney at the Institute for Justice (IJ), which filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case. “Courts have a duty to look carefully at the government’s claim that it has the right to take someone’s home or business, and the Court of Appeals has simply refused to do that.”
While upholding the taking, the New York court did not go so far as to embrace the United States Supreme Court’s much-maligned reasoning in the 2005 Kelo v. City of New London case, which held that the U.S. Constitution allows governments to condemn property for economic development alone. Instead, the Court found the takings were for a “public use” because of the ESDC’s determination that the area to be condemned was “blighted”—a determination that was based on a study paid for by the would-be developer and not even initiated until years after the Atlantic Yards project was announced.
In a dissent, Judge Robert Smith excoriated the majority for abandoning its duty to critically examine the ESDC’s assertions. “To let the agency itself determine when the public use requirement is satisfied is to make the agency a judge in its own cause,” Judge Smith wrote. “I think that it is we who should perform the role of judges, and that we should do so by deciding that the proposed taking in this case is not for public use.”
“The developer’s study did not find anything a normal person would call ‘blight,’” explained Berliner. “Instead, it found that the neighborhood was ‘underutilized’—in other words, that the developer could think of bigger things that could be built where these homes and businesses are. If that is all that is necessary for condemnation, then literally every piece of property in New York is at risk.”
The majority’s opinion frankly acknowledges that the court may be opening the door to “political appointees to public corporations relying on studies paid for by developers . . . [as] a predicate for the invasion of property rights and the razing of homes and businesses.” But, it says, preventing such abuses is not the job of the courts, advising New Yorkers to look to their legislature to fix any problems.
“New York is one of only seven states that has failed utterly to pass any kind of eminent-domain reform in the wake of the Kelo decision, and today’s opinion will only make things worse,” said IJ Staff Attorney Robert McNamara. “The state courts are looking to the legislature to fix the problem, while the legislature is apparently looking to the courts. And that means more and more New Yorkers will be looking at condemnation notices.”
“Property rights are as sacred to citizens of New York as they are to Americans nationwide, and New Yorkers have rightly looked to their courts to protect those rights,” concluded IJ President and General Counsel Chip Mellor. “Today’s opinion should be a clarion call to the state legislature that they cannot avoid this issue any longer. Now is the time to give state residents the reform and protections they desperately need.”
###Christina Walsh
Director of Activism and Coalitions
Institute for Justice
901 N. Glebe Road, Suite 900
Arlington, VA 22203
(703) 682-9320
(703) 682-9321 - fax
www.ij.org
www.castlecoalition.org
This message was sent from Christina Walsh to sharon4anderson@aol.com. It was sent from: Institute for Justice, Institute for Justice 901 N. Glebe Road, Suite 900, Arlington, VA 22203. You can modify/update your subscription via the link below.
Manage your subscription
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle
Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home
FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26
The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
kare11.com_SA
Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com/knowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com/ securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And
No comments:
Post a Comment